Zebra technologies ed kaplan11/28/2023 ![]() Nonproliferation Review 9 (1): 48–53.David “Kap” Kaplan has stories. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Sept/Oct 2000, 37–40. Moon (Eds.) Biological and Toxin Weapons: Research, Development and Use from the Middle Ages to 1945. Harper Collins, London.Ĭanadian Security Intelligence Service, 2000. Saddam’s Secrets: The Hunt for Iraq’s Hidden Weapons. Iraq’s biological weapons: the past as future? JAMA 278, 418–424. Folb, Non Proliferation Review, 2003 (forthcoming). Secrets and Lies: Wouter Basson and South Africa’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme. University of California Press, Berkeley.īurger, M., and C. Anthrax: The Investigation of a Deadly Outbreak. Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Working paper from the Center for Counterproliferation Research, National Defense University, Washington DC. Bioterrorism and Biocrimes: The Illicit use of Biological Agents in the 20 th Century. Wright (ed) Preventing a Biological Arms Race. Yellow Rain in Southeast Asia: the story collapses. The history of the use of bacteriological and chemical agents during Zimbabwe’s liberation war of 1965–80 by Rhodesian forces. Anthrax epizootic in Zimbabwe, 1978–1980: due to deliberate spread? PSR Quarterly 2, 198–209. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 25, 173–227. Cuban allegations of biological warfare by the United States: assessing the evidence. Center for Pacific Asia Studies at Stockholm University Occasional Paper 36. The Korean biological warfare allegations resolved. Report of the International Scientific Commission for the Investigation of the Facts Concerning Bacterial Warfare in Korea and China. International Scientific Commission 1952. Zilinskas (ed) The Microbiologist and Biological Defense research: Ethics, Politics, and International Security. Biological warfare allegations: the Korean War case. Tularemia, biological warfare, and the battle for Stalingrad (1942–1943). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Ĭroddy, E., and S. Random House, New Yorkīojtzov, V., and E. Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World-Told from the Inside by the Man Who Ran It. Unit 731: The Japanese Army’s Secret of Secrets Hodder & Stoughton, London.Īlibek, K., and S. Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare 1932–45 and the American Cover-Up. The Japanese biological warfare programme: an overview. Journal of American History March 2000, 1552–1580. Biological warfare in eighteenth-century North America: beyond Jeffery Amherst. The Nessus shirt in the new world: smallpox blankets in history and legend. Quarterly Journal of Military History, Autumn 1997: 32–37. ![]() Critical Reviews in Microbiology 27 (4): 267–320. Biological weapons in the twentieth century: a review and analysis. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. ![]() All of this is likely to bring new military interest in biological weapons, perhaps even in countries not now considered proliferation risks. The scientific advances are matched by rapid changes in biotechnology and the pharmaceutical industries, as they too assimilate the new methods. These promise increasingly rapid advances in understanding human physiology and microbial pathogenesis. The urgency is made greater by the rapid scientific progress stimulated by genomics, proteomics, and a host of related research technologies. Repairing that gap constitutes an urgent agenda for the international community. The legal regime prohibiting them is clear and in place, but it lacks effective mechanisms to verify compliance and to build confidence in the existing legal regime. Particularly where regional hegemony (or resisting it) may require unconventional weapons, they remain a major threat. ![]() For that reason there has been a continual fascination with them by nations in the last century, a fascination that continues today. Although biological weapons have been used only sporadically throughout human history, and their military effectiveness has never been clearly demonstrated by use in war, the impact of natural disease outbreaks continually reminds us that they are potentially very effective weapons. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |